Career, Work

The Adversarial Workplace Run Amok

03.26.2006 | Chris Bailey

Okay, while I dig deeper in Working Wounded, I just found another of Bob Rosner’s pieces called The Only Thing Worse Than Lawyers… that strongly resonated with me because a set of workplace issues that I’m currently involved in.

In particular, this is the part that spoke most clearly to me:

The adversarial system thrives because we allow it to thrive. We hire lawyers, we encourage them to go off on the “other side” and we look for opportunities to avoid real dialogue with the very people whom we’re struggling with. We have become an entire culture that looks to HR, our bosses and yes, the lawyers to be our “heavy,” to stand up for our rights. Is it any wonder then, why things have gone so horribly wrong?

These issues have actually been a rather long-standing problem for my organization. And here’s the problem: members and staff don’t get along well. Until I read Bob’s post, I hadn’t considered it an adversarial relationship, but that’s pretty much what it is. And it’s a relationship that is crippling what could be a very dynamic and successful association.

For those of you not involved in professional societies or trade associations, this problem might seem a bit foreign. I’ll try to quickly explain. In my association, we not only have to work closely with fellow employees, but volunteer members, as well. Since we are a small association, the staff relies on members to do some of the organization’s work. It is often a very different dynamic working with members than it is working with customers.

Tomorrow, I’m to be on a conference call with member-leaders and I’ve been dreading this call like nobody’s business. I have been anticipating something ugly because of this adversarial relationship. It will be like stepping into a maelstrom of long-brewing conflict and trying to find a different way out…not just for me but all the other participants. It will require me to be both engaged both inside (as a staff employee) and outside (as an objective observer) to the conflict. Scary as hell. It is perhaps the greatest challenge to my own sense of hope that I discussed in my previous entry (it might also seem somewhat contradictory, but then that’s the paradox of our own existence). When is organizational conflict too massive and intertwined in the overall culture for one or even a small group of people to effectively resolve? When is it time to just acknowledge that it’s time to move on to a different workplace where we have a better opportunity to create more soulful work?

I’m not sure why the need to share this story here. I’ve been trying to determine whether I should or not for weeks. My own hope is that it resonates with someone who is experiencing problems with interoffice or intraoffice conflict. If you’re feeling alone, you might wonder if it’s just you and that you’re possibly crazy (as in, this conflict actually doesn’t exist) or naive (as in, this conflict exists and it’s like this everywhere). Let’s see how this goes…

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

3 Responses to “The Adversarial Workplace Run Amok”

  1. Dick Richards Reply

    Chris,

    I haven’t been in much conflict lately and don’t miss it at all . For the most part (not always), I have managed to give up needing to be right, and don’t miss it at all. I am convinced that the root of most conflict is either-or dichotomous thinking and ego that can’t let go of the need to be right. Until we get those things straight with ourselves and with one another, workplace conflict (and most other conflict as well) is inevitable.

  2. Chris Bailey Reply

    You know, Dick, there’s something to what you say about how ego trips us up in our own relationships. And it’s not only a sense of ego in terms of being right, but knowing what’s right for someone else. It’s a paternalism taken to the extreme.

    Here’s my learning from the past week…as an association manager, I need to remember that it’s not my association; the association belongs to the collective membership. Sometimes it’s easy to lose sight of that. There are times when I need to help my members create a better association not through my own ideas alone, but by facilitating the very best ideas from its leaders.

    Each conflict has contributions from all involved parties…maybe I’ve discovered a bit more of how I’ve made my contribution.

  3. Dick Richards Reply

    “it’s not my association” — right! And someone else’s life is not mine, and so forth. But it really is hard to hold onto that awareness. At least it is for me, and also, it seems, for you. Ego rears its head often, and…out on a limb here…we live in a culture of ego in which the economy depends on our desire to feed ego. When Melanie and I were shopping for wedding rings, a saleswoman tried to convince us that, “you deserve diamonds.” The fact was that we didn’t want diamonds.

Leave a Reply

Profile

I help business leaders and their organizations improve how they relate to their customers, employees, and other critical stakeholders. It’s born out of my belief that individuals crave meaningful relationships and want to be involved with companies that connect with them personally. I’m devoted to helping organizations discover the unique qualities that make them remarkable.

I’m currently a Master’s student at the University of North Texas studying business anthropology.

Make Contact

I’m happily located in sunny and beautiful Austin, Texas. Let’s connect:

phone: 512.394.3598
email: chris@chrisbaileyworks.com
twitter: @chris_bailey
skype: chrisbaileyworks
yahoo!: chrisbaileyworks