Business

Don’t Hype Your Employee Branding…Make It Real

01.22.2009 | Chris Bailey

Earlier this week, Michael Arrington at TechCrunch managed to get his mitts on some rather juicy inside information from Google. Turns out that the tech darling isn’t the career paradise that it’s been made out to be. For all the gushing that us outsiders did over their innovative benefits and employment practices, perhaps it was all just hyperbole. From the post:

One message stands out though in most of the posts – employees thought they were entering the promised land when they joined Google, and most of them were disappointed. Some of them wondered if it meant they were somehow lacking. One person sums it all up nicely:

“Those of us who failed to thrive at Google are faced with some pretty serious questions about ourselves. Just seeing that other people ran into the same issues is a huge relief. Google is supposed to be some kind of Nirvana, so if you can’t be happy there how will you ever be happy? It’s supposed to be the ultimate font of technical resources, so if you can’t be productive there how will you ever be productive?”

There are some cautionary lessons to be extracted from this if you’re not only on the hook for your organization’s employer branding but employee engagement.

The reality doesn’t match the expectation. This is a failure of the brand to deliver the expected experience. Consumers rail against companies that deliver poor brand experiences, particularly when the brand has been hyped to the nth degree (e.g., Chevrolet, Sprint, Microsoft Vista). So, why does employer branding get a relatively free pass?

Individuals wanted to work for Google because it was supposed to be different than the norm, had innovative benefits, promoted a fun workplace, etc., etc. Turns out that maybe these were a clever facade masking a workplace and company that were just humdrum. If you want to sell the sizzle, that steak better not come out limp and soggy.

Professional failing is personal failure. It pisses me off when I hear stuff like this. Why? Because there’s a hellacious management problem here that no one is apparently trying to resolve. If a manager is going to wear the big hat and call him- or herself a leader, they better start with making sure that their people are getting what they need to be – and feel – successful. If an employee is struggling with their work, you better believe that’s likely going to get internalized as a “personal” problem. It’s a one-way ticket to not only poor engagement but a morale freefall.

When the going gets tough, uniqueness gets crushed. Yeah, I know…it’s tough out there for business. I get it. Now get over it. Everybody’s impacted so don’t think for a second that you’re special (hell, even Microsoft is laying folks off). So rather than curl up in a ball do something that none of your competition is likely thinking about right now: become even more unique and remarkable. Trust me, your competitor is hoping you’ll lay low like them. Instead, do something that will make their management wet themselves. Actually engage in employer branding. Build a workplace model where the people you have are doing their best not because they’re scared to death they’ll lose their job tomorrow if they don’t, but because they genuinely care about their work and their organization. Go out and look for the talent that’s looking for a place to make a difference (there’s plenty of good folks out there now).

Don’t waste this perfectly good opportunity. Be a leader, show some guts, and build something special when no one else appears to be doing it.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

6 Responses to “Don’t Hype Your Employee Branding…Make It Real”

  1. Michelle Malay Carter Reply

    Hi Chris,

    Nice post. There is a macro issue here and a micro issue here. It’s been said that people don’t leave companies, they leave managers. According to First, Break All the Rules, the number one determinant of an employee’s length of tenure is their relationship with their immediate manager.

    Using a requisite model, one can define the minimum criteria for an effective leader/direct report relationship as the leader being able to add value to the thinking of the employee. In work levels terminology that means the leader has cognitive capacity one level above the direct report.

    Our research (with over 5,000 data points) shows that about 39% of the time, this criteria is not met. It does not mean the manager is a problem. It does not mean the employee is a problem. It means that there is a structural problem that needs to be addressed.

    If a wooden bridge collapsed under the weight of truck, you wouldn’t blame the wood or the truck, you would blame the engineer. Who is engineering our organizations and what science based principles are the basing their designs upon? I’m OK. You’re OK. Let’s fix the system.

    Regards,

    Michelle Malay Carter

  2. Chris Bailey Reply

    Hi Michelle, I really appreciate your input that there’s a deeper structural issue here, particularly where management is involved. I would say similar issues affect the employer brand at a deeper level, too. It’s a juicy idea that could warrant some research. Perhaps its something that I’ll explore on my business anthropology side.

  3. Robert Richman Reply

    Wow, I had no idea. This is really interesting to read. I love the line you mentioned about how important is to *feel* successful and valued. It makes me think back to huge projects I worked on and didn’t feel good about because I didn’t feel its success, and there were small ones I did fantastically well with and felt hugely rewarded by it. Thanks for bringing up that distinction.

  4. Chris Bailey Reply

    @Robert: thanks for reading and leaving your thoughts. I think that we’ve engineered “feeling” and humanness out of the organizational workplace. But I’m a diehard idealist and believe we’ll finally bring them into work and management soon. Cheers!

  5. Robert Richman Reply

    I agree! I’ve been working with the authors of a new book that I think will be leading the charge for that.. It’s called the Three Laws of Performance. I can get you some blogger-only materials if you’re interested in the concept.

  6. Chris Bailey Reply

    @Robert, that would be great! I think the time is ripe for these ideas to finally cross the tipping point. If the materials need a mailing address, send me an email at chris@baileyworkplay.com and I’ll forward you my local. Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Profile

I help business leaders and their organizations improve how they relate to their customers, employees, and other critical stakeholders. It’s born out of my belief that individuals crave meaningful relationships and want to be involved with companies that connect with them personally. I’m devoted to helping organizations discover the unique qualities that make them remarkable.

I’m currently a Master’s student at the University of North Texas studying business anthropology.

Make Contact

I’m happily located in sunny and beautiful Austin, Texas. Let’s connect:

phone: 512.394.3598
twitter: @chris_bailey
skype: chrisbaileyworks
or email me…