Three Questions For Every PR Professional
06.23.2010 | Chris Bailey | Focused on Communication
I don’t get them everyday, but today I received three emails from assorted PR agencies that kind of struck a nerve. I’m not technically in public relations, but I am heavily involved in communications so I know a thing or two about what works and what really sucks. Don’t worry…this isn’t going to be a “Bash PR” post. Well, at least not totally. Instead, I’m hoping I can offer some feedback to those in the PR profession who might listen and take heed.
Here we go.
First question you need to ask yourself is:
Does this contact actually want to be connected with our agency?
Email #1 was a very brief email from one agency’s Media Researcher (taking a guess that this is a “fresh out of college” type position) who asked:
Could you tell me if this e-mail is still valid as a contact for you at Alchemy of Soulful Work? It keeps bouncing.
chris@baileyworkplay.com
Thanks so much.
Regards,
xxxxx
If you find my email address is bouncing then go to the trouble to visit my site and send an email to my new address, why not invest a wee bit of time to building a relationship? This Media Researcher just missed a golden opportunity to understand what types of communications I’d like to receive. Or even ask if I’d like to continue to receive emails on behalf of their clients. (Ironic sidenote: I no longer use chris@baileyworkplay.com because of all of the PR blast spam I got at this address.)
Just like any other type of email communication (like newsletters), I don’t mind receiving them when the content is fascinating and important to my work. But don’t just assume because you have my email address, that I’m a captive audience who is automatically interested in whatever your client is doing. Apply some permission-based email marketing practices and you might discover better ROI because I’ll be a willing participant in your media outreach.
Relatedly, another question is:
How is my client going to make you look good?
It’s easy to get wrapped up in the awesomeness, amazingness, incredibleness, stupendousness of your client. He or she (or it, if we’re talking about a brand) is paying you to promote their greatness. But no matter how terrific your client is, no blogger or online influential cares if this marvelousness doesn’t rub off on them in some way. So your job is to connect the dots and make the case for why I should take time to read their book or schedule an interview. Deep down, I really don’t care about all the great things your client does if it doesn’t help me achieve my own goals.
And again, remember its not just me you’re pitching. You’re asking me to connect you with my friends, colleagues, readers…in other words, my own social network. Clearly demonstrate what’s in it for me and I’ll be more likely to want to help you.
Finally, the big question you have to ask is:
Why should you want a relationship with me, my agency, and my client?
For the love of all things holy, stop thinking short-term, small ball. That game played out fine ten or twenty years ago but its all changed now. If you’re trying to drive results through cold, impersonal email blasts that don’t address me by name (email works different than fax), include other email addesses in the To: line (yes, unbelievably I know the other email addresses that received the blast), and offer no opt-out provision (which is kind of breaking the law), then have fun on the ride down. I guess that means your client is riding shotgun.
Time to wake up and realize the PR game is now played through relationships.
And it’s not as if these questions are just for PR folks. They’re applicable to customer experience, marketing, and sales folks as well. Just focusing on your side of the action without considering the relationship with the folks on the other side squanders the potential connection. And in this case, everyone suffers.
photo credit: tashland (via Flickr)
4 Responses to “Three Questions For Every PR Professional”
Leave a Reply










Public relations is about creating relationships … between consumers and our clients, between journalists and our clients, etc. It makes me LIVID when "PR pros" mass distribute a news release and/or pitch.
At our firm we don't mass distribute. Everyone is instructed to research the media outlet and the people that we THINK we should be contacting. We tailor our pitches to each contact as much as possible and work hard to build relationships. After all, those relationships are what makes us succeed (or fail).
I talked about this very topic on our own blog: http://www.snackbox.us/blog/2010/4/19/jennas-medi... http://www.snackbox.us/blog/2010/2/2/spray-and-pr...
Let me give you the response I gave our colleague Lani the other day: You’re either dealing with junior staffers who don’t know better (because they haven’t been taught), or marketers disguised as PR people, or both. Let me explain:
I tend to think that the “throw a pot of spaghetti against the wall and see what sticks” type of pitching to be more marketing than PR. (And I believe I owe that analogy to Jenna from conversations we’ve had.) That’s because it may work in getting great placements, but at the cost of pissing off a bunch of influential people. It’s Machavellian ROI, in my opinion. And real PR pros won’t stomach it. It’s not in our DNA.
Jenna is right: real PR people understand the relationship part. It happens to be in our job title. We thoughtfully research. Always. I’m very selective about who I pitch–maybe a bit too selective. And my criteria for selecting people to pitch includes my gut feeling that this contact is such a good match that they will end up thanking ME for making their life easier (not the other way around).
That’s it. All offended marketers can direct your comments to Chris…and I’ll buy him a beer later.
LuAnn (and Jenna, as well), I'm wondering about a couple of things you don't mention: geography and size. Most of the spammy, self-serving PR communications I receive are usually from large agencies from either NYC or Chicago. Do we have a dinosaur problem here?
And I'll defend my marketing brethren (and piss off another group) by speculating that the worst offenders operate like advertisers. It's a bloody shame really. I've started a guerilla campaign to reach out to the clients and remark about the shoddiness of their agency's work. I like to think of it as education.
Chris – there really isn't too much to add to what LuAnn and Jenna have said, because they are absolutely right. PR should be about building the relationship w/the right person and doing so strategically. Not just throwing a worm out and hoping for a bit (this may work on Lake Travis tho.
).
Regarding LuAnn's comment about marketers…I will refrain from too much comment other than to say some marketers do it right. These are the ones that understand that all things marketing should be about building relationships w/their audience no matter which channel the message is being delivered in. Each channel does have it's nuances…learn those.
Thanks for the post Chris. Well done!