The Greatest Threat To Innovation? Our Impatience

I’ve worked with customers and around technology long enough to see something disturbing happen. I’m not sure when it all started. Maybe it was always there but only exacerbated by the 24/7, always-on nature of today’s news machines. But regardless of how it began, this trend right now has the potential to destroy everything it touches. What is this trend?

Our impatience and cynical criticism of anything new that isn’t absolutely perfect.

We’re like Statler and Walforf from The Muppet Show whose sole role was to throw barbs at the performers (except most of us armchair pundits are not quite as witty or endearing as our Muppet counterparts). Oh and I’m not throwing my own criticism out to everyone else but me. I’m putting myself squarely in the middle of this trend. As an anthropologist, I can see the fingerprints of cultural entanglement all over this problem. None of us are immune from feeling impatient with technology (or really any customer-related experience) that doesn’t meet our ever increasingly high expectations. And therein lies the key problem.

We’ve assumed a sense of entitlement which is nothing more than consumer empowerment gone awry and to the extremes. We think we’re entitled to a perfect first product with no flaws. Witness Exhibit A: Dell’s try at building their first tablet, the Streak. Yes, I was a beta tester and have been using the Streak for a few months so can attest it has some significant issues. But I hope Dell doesn’t pull up stakes and quit because of all the fierce condemnations they’ve received from several tech publications. Instead, I hope they have guts and a long-term strategy that sees this as a building block.

Exhibit B (and actually what provoked this post) is how fast we’ve decided that Apple’s Ping is a failure. Dammit, it just started…and yet here’s a perfect example of how quickly the critics will descend on anything new. Anyone who has started to look at Ping should have instantly recognized it is an emerging work in progress. And whether it ultimately works or not, it deserves a chance to try and make it.

And here’s another one about Ping as a spammers delight. Yeah, Apple’s engineers should have foreseen this. But anyone who knows how tech products get to market also knows the challenges of sealing up every single hole in a first release. The beauty of web-based apps is how quickly things can get resolved once they are put out into the wild.

And lest you think I’m defending Apple and Ping, I’m actually defending the product’s right to get itself into the consumers’ hands and make necessary adjustments through time. And to do that, we have to be patient as consumers and not expect demand perfection from the get-go. If we can’t manage to do this, we’re looking at a very unattractive future possibility:

The idea of new takes on a different, ever increasingly derogatory meaning. Fewer and fewer companies will decide to take risks and build new technologies for fear of getting blasted (at best) or ignored (at worst) because they didn’t meet increasing standards that become nearly impossible to meet in first iterations. And then we are only the poorer for our own lack of patience.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

, , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Hi Chris;
I like your reading list. How do you like 'excellence by design'?
Dan

Thanks, Dan. Excellence by Design is interesting. A bit dry in spots but overall has some terrific ideas for rethinking the workplace.

Hey Chris, great post (as always!) I do have a different take on the matter though and I'd love to hear your thoughts.

Here's where we differ - I think consumers are entitled to a perfect first release. It's not easy, or even feasible in some cases, but it is a just expectation once that customer has invested her money or time. This doesn't apply to beta releases as that very label indicates instability, but once a product is 1.0, it should be stable and it should deliver the features it promises and meet the use cases it was built to address.

If a company releases a less than stellar product, they should be prepared to be blasted or ignored. The good ones will learn and improve.

So, is it possible that we (those who produce products) have grown used to the ease with which we can patch our work and thus have lost sight of a truly solid first release?

I'd say our experiences are proving that to be the case more often than not.
My recent post How To Properly Apply for a Design Position

Thanks for adding to the dialogue, Alex. Actually, I don't think we're that far apart in our thinking. I agree that if a customer is paying for a product, they deserve a pretty well-baked first release. Will it be perfect? Maybe not...but the development and product management teams must strive to make it as perfect as possible.

But I also believe that one reason why some folks are not naturally early adopters is because they know there will be kinks and bugs to work out in those early versions. So there's sort of an inherent understanding that early versions won't be 100% bulletproof...particularly when it comes to tech.

To your question about losing sight of a solid first release: maybe so. I also think that as our products become more and more complex and our user-base becoming (perhaps) more and more diverse it may not be possible to catch all the different use cases that could contribute to problems.

With all of that said, I still firmly believe that the pervasive (and frequently unfair) sniping that comes from the trade mags and social media armchair critics doesn't help anything. It doesn't aim to improve anything, only tear it down. And that is a problem.